Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Far from being ‘too big’, all evidence suggests that Dublin is suffering from a gap
in productive infrastructure investment.
While Dublin’s offering as a location for inward investment is second to none,
there has been significant erosion of its attractiveness in recent years due high
housing costs, poor transport and inadequate infrastructure and local services.
Inward investment lost to Dublin is usually lost to Ireland, as MNCs in key
services and advanced manufacturing areas want to locate in a large urban area.
Firms will continue to want to locate in the Dublin Region, regardless of a policy
ambition to spread FDI evenly throughout all regions.
Despite this, there is a pervasive criticism that Dublin gets disproportionate FDI
due to it being a favoured location for Government investment.
An analysis by Dublin Chamber shows that, far from being a favoured location
for Government investment, the four Dublin Local Authorities receive
significantly less than everywhere else in the country on a per resident basis.
Although it is the economic capital of Ireland, with 47% of national employment
being located in the GDA, Dublin has received much less investment in its
productive infrastructure than is required for it to remain a highly competitive
location.
1
Feb 2017
1
Despite having such pressures on its productive and social infrastructure, over
the past 7 years, the county received the second lowest capital investment per
capita by central government, receiving less than 50% of the national average
and just 30% of the counties that received the highest levels of funding, such as
Sligo, Kilkenny and Mayo.
Severe levels of underinvestment in its local infrastructure and capital
maintenance, including Housing, Transport, Environment, Development
Management, Education and Employment Services Recreation and General
Purpose Grants is beginning to cost Dublin and Ireland dearly.
The evidence is that FDI firms decide to locate in Dublin despite its sub-par
offering in terms of productive infrastructure, due to the high value they attach
to clustering and agglomeration.
Insufficiently investing in Dublin’s productive infrastructure will not lead more
firms to locate to other regions, it will lead to them locate to other countries.
Lack of investment in core economic infrastructure, such as transport, water,
electricity and housing, has yet to seriously affect inward investment. But sub-
standard infrastructure is beginning to be seen as a huge negative for firms
looking to invest in Dublin.
Other Findings:
Ø On a per capita basis, Dublin has received below average current funding for
local services and average total spending by central government 2009-2016
Ø Dublin has received one of the lowest capital investment per capita in
housing by the Central Government over the 2009-16 period, despite having
proportionately the highest number of households reliant on social housing
supports
Ø Dubliner’s pay proportionally by far the highest household and personal taxes
of anywhere in the country, with the average Dubliner paying over 3 times
the average per capita taxes
2
Average
Annual
Capital
Spending
per
capita
2009-‐2016
Kilkenny
Leitrim
Westmeath
Roscommon
Mayo
Kildare
Longford
Laois
Monaghan
Average
Tipperary
Clare
Kerry
Galway
Waterford
Limerick
Wexford
Donegal
Offaly
Cavan
Cork
Meath
Wicklow
Louth
Dublin
Carlow
€
-‐
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
3
Capital
Spending
by
Central
Gov
in
Local
Authority
1600
1400
2009-‐2016
Dublin Average all LAs Galway Sligo
1200
amount per capita, €
1000
800
600
400
200
0
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
4
The Dublin Region also experienced below average current funding for public
services delivered by Local Government (including water, traffic services, waste,
environment etc.) while Dublin had the fourth lowest social transfers per capita
over the 2009-2016 period.
5
Despite having the highest housing needs in the country (proportionally the
highest social housing waiting lists and numbers in need of social housing
supports, such as HAP or Rent Supplement), the four Dublin LAs received the
one of the lowest capital spends on housing.
Westmeath
Monaghan
Waterford
Tipperary
Longford
Wexford
Wicklow
Galway
Kilkenny
Limerick
Donegal
Average
Dublin
Leitrim
Carlow
Kildare
Meath
Cavan
Offaly
Kerry
Louth
Mayo
Clare
Laois
Sligo
Cork
700
1400
600 1200
500 1000
400 800
300 600
200 400
100 200
0 0
6
In terms of total expenditure, Dublin received average level of allocations/
spending per capita by Central Government. This includes all Local Government
Funding, a large portion of infrastrucutre investment (e.g. National Roads),
spending on Public Sector Pay and spending on social transfers. Overall this
accounts for 77% of total voted exechequer expenditure.
Average
Total
Spending
per
annum
by
Central
Government
by
County,
14,000
2009-‐2016
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
-‐
Average Total Spending 2009-‐16, per capita Average Total Spending 2009-‐16, millions
7
Dubliners pay by far the highest levels of personal and household taxes per
capita (€15,000 vs. average of €4,000 per annum). In terms of total individual
and household taxes (personal, product, household) the average Dubliner pays
over 3 times the average per capita tax nationwide, however the average
household income is only 28% higher than the national average, which does not
factor into consideration costs of living in Dublin.
12000 40%
10000
30%
8000
6000 20%
4000
10%
2000
0 0%
Dublin
Westmeath
Cork
Kildare
Kerry
Clare
Galway
Leitrim
Offaly
average
Limerick
Meath
Kilkenny
Waterford
Louth
Cavan
Carlow
Mayo
Monaghan
Wexford
Sligo
Tipperary
Longford
Roscommon
Donegal
Wicklow
Note: Left-Axis displays personal and household taxation collected per capita in each
county. Personal Taxation includes receipts from VAT plus employee & employer PAYE,
USI and PRSI (source: Revenue); Household Taxation includes Local Property Tax
(source: Revenue) plus Motor Tax Receipts (source: Department of Housing). Right-Axis
displays Total Revenue collected by county including receipts from all product, business,
personal and household taxes (source: Revenue)
8
Methodology and Data Sources
‘Spending’ does not include all spending by Central Government in an area, but
is estimated using the following method.
Overall our analysis accounts for 77% of annual voted exechequer expenditure.
This data is from the annual Local Authority Budget publication from
Department of Housing, Planning, Community and Local Government.
4. Public Sector Wages: we attributed the public sector wage bill to each
region and county using the following method:
a) Total Public Sector Workers (CSO, Earnings Hours and Employment Costs
Survey, 2008-2017)
b) Total Public Sector Wage Bill (DEPR, 2009-2016)
c) % Regional Employment (Located) in County (CSO, Census 2016, Profile 6
Commuting Patterns)
d) ‘Public Sector’ Employment (Resident) in NUTS 2 Region (Source QNHS
1998-Q3 2017)
e) This is the number of people employed in 3 NACE Rev 2 Economic
Sectors: Public Administration & Defence, Education & Human Health and
Social Work Activities
f) While the number of people employed in these categories is more than the
number of persons employed in the public sector (Incl. Semi-States but
9
does this incl. LOCAL AUTHORITES) this is only used to get the percentage
of public sector employees living in each region
g) % Public Sector Employment by Region (NACE) (Source QNHS 1998-Q3
2017) i.e. 10% of Public Sector Employees Located in Border Region, 30%
in Dublin
h) Estimated Public Sector Employment in County = (1 * 5) = Number of
National Public Sector Workers Attributed to Region * % Regional
Employment Located in County
i) % National Public Sector Employment Located in County
j) Amount of National Public Sector Wage Bill Attributed to County (Millions)
= Public Sector Wage Bill * % National Public Sector Employment Located
in County
The balance was provided through the Local Government Fund and the
Environment Fund both of which are administered by the Department of
the Environment, Community and Local Government (the Department
10
In 2014, 87% of the total funding provision from central government to
local authorities was accounted for by three categories. Those were
transport (37%), housing and urban regeneration programmes (34%)
and general purpose grants (16%).
11
III. General Purpose Grants – Mostly Current Expenditure
12
Breakdown Taxation by County
TAXATION = PERSONAL + PRODUCT + BUSINESS + HOUSEHOLD TAXES
vat_internal
paye_income_tax_and_usc
self_employed_income_tax
corporation_tax_
capital_gains_tax
13